On Thu, 2012-11-08 at 05:52 -0500, Kamil Paral wrote: > > Worth considering the history: Petr proposed the general idea of a > > criterion as part of the criteria review, and I drafted the final > > wording. See thread "New criterion for Memory test" from end of > > January. > > Thanks for finding that thread. We have to find a way how to link > criteria with list discussions, so that it would be much easier to > read all relevant discussion to a particular criterion. Putting that > into my todo list (page 937). I usually mention the thread when editing the criteria page (but of course you have to find the release it was originally put in), and the way I found this one was just to search my mail archives for anything with the strings 'mem' and 'criter' in the subject :) > The thread indicates the criterion was created ad-hoc, "the tool is > there, let's codify it". Since we try to be more conservative about > what is and what is not a blocker lately, I think this is a good > candidate for removal. Yeah, I think you have a point, as I said. -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | identi.ca: adamwfedora http://www.happyassassin.net -- test mailing list test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
