Re: TC7 bootloader installation

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 11/04/2012 01:03 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Sun, 2012-11-04 at 00:53 +0100, Dennis Jacobfeuerborn wrote:
>> On 11/04/2012 12:10 AM, Chris Murphy wrote:
>>>
>>> On Nov 3, 2012, at 10:10 PM, Adam Williamson <awilliam@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>
>>>> I don't know, though, if it's actually been implemented yet, or if it's
>>>> still on someone's todo list. I couldn't find anything in the git log
>>>> for it, but I may have missed it. I've added bcl and dlehman to the bug
>>>> and asked them to comment.
>>>
>>> Bug 861192?
>>>
>>> I'm a little mystified by people who want to force a bootloader into a file system that doesn't offer a sufficient bootloader region for a bootloader to fit (e.g. ext[234] and XFS). I think there should be a none option, rather than a redirect and force option.
>>
>> What I would like to see is proper support for UEFI multiboot. Right now
>> installing a new Fedora next to the live one is difficult since it doesn't
>> support creating individual UEFI boot entried for each installation but
>> only a global one which runs contrary to having this feature in UEFI in the
>> first place.
>> I'm bringing this up because in the UEFI multiboot case you don't care for
>> either the MBR nor a partition bootloader so this use-case should be taken
>> into account.
> 
> Bad news:
> 
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=759303
> 
> Jesse, any chance you're going to change your mind here? :)

That's strange given that the whole point of providing this in UEFI is to
fix the battle for the MBR on multiboot systems.

Also what does this mean for UEFI installations with Fedora? When I install
F18 will it detect that the UEFI bits already exists on the harddisk and
overwrite only the binary bits and only add the new install to the grub menu?

While I get that BIOS stuff needs to be supported for a while I think
supporting UEFI multiboot would simplify things because you can separate
the installations completely rather than having to deal with updating
existing boot structures that could potentially break stuff.

Regards,
  Dennis


-- 
test mailing list
test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test



[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Photo Sharing]     [Yosemite Forum]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux