On Sun, 2012-11-04 at 00:53 +0100, Dennis Jacobfeuerborn wrote: > On 11/04/2012 12:10 AM, Chris Murphy wrote: > > > > On Nov 3, 2012, at 10:10 PM, Adam Williamson <awilliam@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > >> I don't know, though, if it's actually been implemented yet, or if it's > >> still on someone's todo list. I couldn't find anything in the git log > >> for it, but I may have missed it. I've added bcl and dlehman to the bug > >> and asked them to comment. > > > > Bug 861192? > > > > I'm a little mystified by people who want to force a bootloader into a file system that doesn't offer a sufficient bootloader region for a bootloader to fit (e.g. ext[234] and XFS). I think there should be a none option, rather than a redirect and force option. > > What I would like to see is proper support for UEFI multiboot. Right now > installing a new Fedora next to the live one is difficult since it doesn't > support creating individual UEFI boot entried for each installation but > only a global one which runs contrary to having this feature in UEFI in the > first place. > I'm bringing this up because in the UEFI multiboot case you don't care for > either the MBR nor a partition bootloader so this use-case should be taken > into account. Bad news: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=759303 Jesse, any chance you're going to change your mind here? :) -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | identi.ca: adamwfedora http://www.happyassassin.net -- test mailing list test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
