Re: 2012-10-29 - Fedora QA Meeting - recap

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, 29 Oct 2012 19:22:58 -0700
Adam Williamson <awilliam@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> On Tue, 2012-10-30 at 00:59 +0000, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote:
> > On 10/29/2012 07:06 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > > 	* We agreed that any decision to take LVM-by-default
> > > 	  (see ticket[2]) made after today (2012-10-29) must
> > > include a slip for testing
> > 
> > Decision not yet made on the relevant day and another day has
> > risen...
> 
> Yeah. At this point I don't think we could take the change if we were
> going to sign off on Thursday.
> 
> Unfortunately, it looks very much like we're slipping anyway. We have
> two unaddressed accepted blockers and five unaddressed proposed
> blockers, we don't have an RC, dgilmore is out for two and a half days
> after tomorrow, and fedup is still not close to being done.
> 
> In the case that FESCo votes to take the change, I guess we can now
> just say 'there's no chance we're going to Go on Thursday' and take
> the change into anaconda immediately, or we can wait until after the
> Go/No-Go meeting and take the change then, assuming we slipped. I'm
> not sure which course would be better. Any thoughts?

Well, it's still not sure that FESCo wishes to take the change...
hopefully at least one more FESCo member will emerge from the hurricane
and chime in on ticket. As soon as that happens, we should make the
change. IMHO.

kevin

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

-- 
test mailing list
test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Photo Sharing]     [Yosemite Forum]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux