|
On 10/25/2012 01:41 PM, "Jóhann B.
Guðmundsson" wrote:
On 10/25/2012 08:26 PM, Adam
Williamson wrote:
On this topic...Ric Wheeler came up with some fairly good arguments in
favour of keeping the LVM default and proposed it on the anaconda list
this morning (actually I think the post may not have been approved yet,
but it'll show up soon). Since we're post-freeze now I summarized the
debate into a bug report and nominated it for NTH:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=870207
I think it's still true to say that our *original* reasons for
defaulting to LVM don't really hold any more, but Ric made some pretty
decent *current* arguments for keeping that default until we switch to
btrfs-by-default.
First of all this has been known this whole time Ric is not
bringing anything new to the table and I nack to this proposal
it's to dam late in the release cycle to change this now and if we
change this it means we have to slip another week to properly test
anaconda with lvm as default against the alpha and beta criteria
I am under the impression that we've been testing with/without LVM
anyway, both scenarios? In any case, it doesn't seem as earthshaking
as other developments - it's just making the default be what it's
been for some time, and given that there exists documentation for
the "lvm enabled case" and not much otherwise it seems like a
reasonable thing to do. I would almost make the case that disabling
LVM by default - were it a feature - would require a lot of that
backup documentation and info that isn't really there....
Can we please stop messing around with the installer!
JBG
|
--
test mailing list
test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
