On 10/25/2012 11:24 PM, Robyn Bergeron wrote:
I am under the impression that we've been testing with/without LVM anyway, both scenarios?
The installer has been defaulting to EXT4 up to this point there is no option to hash or unhash lvm as you could do in the oldUI in the newUI and custom partitioning has been more or less broken this whole time.
The oldUI rendered ext4 vs lvm argument moot because it was equally easy/hard to disable/enable it for both parties.
In any case, it doesn't seem as earthshaking as other developments - it's just making the default be what it's been for some time, and given that there exists documentation for the "lvm enabled case" and not much otherwise it seems like a reasonable thing to do. I would almost make the case that disabling LVM by default - were it a feature - would require a lot of that backup documentation and info that isn't really there....
I think you should focus on getting the feature process to actually define what it considers as an actual feature before you propose removing lvm as "feature" .
From that same argumental stand point removing the functionality of disabling lvm as easily as it was in F17 should have been mentioned on the newUI feature page.
JBG -- test mailing list test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
