On Wed, 2012-10-24 at 07:18 -0600, Tim Flink wrote: > On Wed, 24 Oct 2012 09:48:47 +0000 > "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" <johannbg@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > On 10/24/2012 03:33 AM, Adam Williamson wrote: > > > criterion" - not done yet > > > * "tflink to ask other interested parties (anaconda team, > > > fesco...) to look over the beta criteria and see if > > > there's anything they feel should be dialled down" - not done yet > > > > Since you guys seem to be not confident enough in our own criteria > > writing perhaps we should just stop writing them and have FESCO > > writing those for us? > > I think there is a difference between confidence and realizing that > we (and by we, I mean Fedora QA) are not omniscient - we can't > possibly know everything about what's reasonable and what makes up > a set of acceptably comprehensive criteria to describe an acceptable > release. > > There is wisdom in getting input from other groups - QA is a part of > Fedora as a whole, not some completely isolated group which dictates > the definition of a quality release. There is also wisdom in not setting > the bar too high - that's a great path to irrelevance and having the > criteria ignored. Right. I do wish you wouldn't exaggerate things, Johann. The criteria are a part of Fedora as a whole, they define what the project considers minimum acceptable functionality for each release point. They are not solely a QA issue, other teams clearly have input into the question. -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | identi.ca: adamwfedora http://www.happyassassin.net -- test mailing list test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
