On Wed, 24 Oct 2012 09:48:47 +0000 "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" <johannbg@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 10/24/2012 03:33 AM, Adam Williamson wrote: > > criterion" - not done yet > > * "tflink to ask other interested parties (anaconda team, > > fesco...) to look over the beta criteria and see if > > there's anything they feel should be dialled down" - not done yet > > Since you guys seem to be not confident enough in our own criteria > writing perhaps we should just stop writing them and have FESCO > writing those for us? I think there is a difference between confidence and realizing that we (and by we, I mean Fedora QA) are not omniscient - we can't possibly know everything about what's reasonable and what makes up a set of acceptably comprehensive criteria to describe an acceptable release. There is wisdom in getting input from other groups - QA is a part of Fedora as a whole, not some completely isolated group which dictates the definition of a quality release. There is also wisdom in not setting the bar too high - that's a great path to irrelevance and having the criteria ignored. Tim
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
-- test mailing list test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
