On Tue, Oct 23, 2012 at 10:51 AM, Kevin Fenzi <kevin@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Tue, 23 Oct 2012 08:48:21 -0400 > Josh Boyer <jwboyer@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> Maybe I missed this somewhere, but why is fpaste being replaced to >> begin with? It's been working fine for a really long time. I guess >> I don't see the benefit of replacing it with something that doesn't >> actually replace it. > > Well, a variety of reasons: > > - It actually doesn't work fine. ;) From time to time it's prone to > rejecting new pastes with a "Sorry, you broke our server". This > confuses especially new folks. OK, I have seen that. It is definitely irritating, but I figured it was a bug that just needed to be fixed. > - fpaste.org is not controlled at all my fedora infrastructure. The > folks who do run it would like to get our of the business of doing > so. So... with the new sticky-notes thing are we going to have a new domain name too? Or are they going to just redirect fpaste.org to <whatever>? > - We tried to clean up and package and use the existing code on > fpaste.org, but it's got lots of issues and in the end it was decided > it wasn't very maintainable, so sticky notes was picked from the > active pastebin servers out there. OK. josh -- test mailing list test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
