On Tue, 23 Oct 2012 08:48:21 -0400 Josh Boyer <jwboyer@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Maybe I missed this somewhere, but why is fpaste being replaced to > begin with? It's been working fine for a really long time. I guess > I don't see the benefit of replacing it with something that doesn't > actually replace it. Well, a variety of reasons: - It actually doesn't work fine. ;) From time to time it's prone to rejecting new pastes with a "Sorry, you broke our server". This confuses especially new folks. - fpaste.org is not controlled at all my fedora infrastructure. The folks who do run it would like to get our of the business of doing so. - We tried to clean up and package and use the existing code on fpaste.org, but it's got lots of issues and in the end it was decided it wasn't very maintainable, so sticky notes was picked from the active pastebin servers out there. By all means do provide feedback on it while it's in staging especially. We would like it to work well... kevin
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
-- test mailing list test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
