On Wed, 2012-10-10 at 14:48 -0400, Kamil Paral wrote: > On today's blocker bug meeting, we agreed that we don't need to require both NFS and NFSISO to work for Beta, just one is enough. Anaconda team claims NFSISO support has a lot of issues that are hard to solve. > > Current Beta criterion reads: > > " The installer must be able to use the HTTP, FTP and NFS remote package source options " > > The new proposed Beta wording is: > > " The installer must be able to use the HTTP, FTP and either NFS or NFSISO remote package source options " > > The current Final criterion reads: > > " The installer must be able to use all supported local and remote package source options " > > As you can see, that doesn't need to change, includes both NFS and NFSISO. Seems simple enough to me. I'm a bit leery of whether it's entirely clear what 'NFSISO' is if you don't already know, but hell, that's hardly the *worst* problem we have with clarity in the criteria :) ack! -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | identi.ca: adamwfedora http://www.happyassassin.net -- test mailing list test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
