Hey, On Wed, 13 Jun 2012 14:57:21 -0700 Adam Williamson <awilliam@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Wed, 2012-06-13 at 16:52 -0500, Ian Pilcher wrote: > > On 06/13/2012 12:03 PM, Adam Williamson wrote: > > > So it sounds like, right now, what you can do is take an existing > > > bridged config, drop NM_CONTROLLED=no from the ifcfg files, > > > enable the NM service if necessary, and then see if NM takes over > > > properly. It doesn't seem to be explicitly stated, but reading > > > between the lines, the UI stuff isn't done yet. > > > > > > > I just tried this, and NetworkManager didn't bring up either the > > physical interface or the bridge. Here are ifcfg-eth0 and > > ifcfg-br0: > > > > DEVICE=eth0 > > ONBOOT=yes > > TYPE=Ethernet > > IPV6INIT=no > > HWADDR=00:22:4d:4f:c7:ed > > BRIDGE=br0 > > #NM_CONTROLLED=no > > > > IPADDR=172.31.250.1 > > GATEWAY=172.31.250.254 > > NETMASK=255.255.255.0 > > DEVICE=br0 > > ONBOOT=yes > > TYPE=Bridge > > IPV6INIT=no > > DELAY=0 > > #NM_CONTROLLED=no > > > > Anyone have any ideas? > > Not here. Might be worth poking Dan directly by email or on IRC > (dcbw). He may be able to clarify. Did anyone do this yet? If not, what is Dan's email adress? I'm trying this on F-17 and have the same experience -- it's simply not doing anything. --Stijn -- test mailing list test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
