On Wed, 2012-06-13 at 16:52 -0500, Ian Pilcher wrote: > On 06/13/2012 12:03 PM, Adam Williamson wrote: > > So it sounds like, right now, what you can do is take an existing > > bridged config, drop NM_CONTROLLED=no from the ifcfg files, enable the > > NM service if necessary, and then see if NM takes over properly. It > > doesn't seem to be explicitly stated, but reading between the lines, the > > UI stuff isn't done yet. > > > > I just tried this, and NetworkManager didn't bring up either the > physical interface or the bridge. Here are ifcfg-eth0 and ifcfg-br0: > > DEVICE=eth0 > ONBOOT=yes > TYPE=Ethernet > IPV6INIT=no > HWADDR=00:22:4d:4f:c7:ed > BRIDGE=br0 > #NM_CONTROLLED=no > > IPADDR=172.31.250.1 > GATEWAY=172.31.250.254 > NETMASK=255.255.255.0 > DEVICE=br0 > ONBOOT=yes > TYPE=Bridge > IPV6INIT=no > DELAY=0 > #NM_CONTROLLED=no > > Anyone have any ideas? Not here. Might be worth poking Dan directly by email or on IRC (dcbw). He may be able to clarify. -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | identi.ca: adamwfedora http://www.happyassassin.net -- test mailing list test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
