On 06/13/2012 12:03 PM, Adam Williamson wrote: > So it sounds like, right now, what you can do is take an existing > bridged config, drop NM_CONTROLLED=no from the ifcfg files, enable the > NM service if necessary, and then see if NM takes over properly. It > doesn't seem to be explicitly stated, but reading between the lines, the > UI stuff isn't done yet. > I just tried this, and NetworkManager didn't bring up either the physical interface or the bridge. Here are ifcfg-eth0 and ifcfg-br0: DEVICE=eth0 ONBOOT=yes TYPE=Ethernet IPV6INIT=no HWADDR=00:22:4d:4f:c7:ed BRIDGE=br0 #NM_CONTROLLED=no IPADDR=172.31.250.1 GATEWAY=172.31.250.254 NETMASK=255.255.255.0 DEVICE=br0 ONBOOT=yes TYPE=Bridge IPV6INIT=no DELAY=0 #NM_CONTROLLED=no Anyone have any ideas? -- ======================================================================== Ian Pilcher arequipeno@xxxxxxxxx "If you're going to shift my paradigm ... at least buy me dinner first." ======================================================================== -- test mailing list test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
