Re: F17 vs. Pentium 4

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, 19 Apr 2012, Adam Williamson wrote:

On Thu, 2012-04-19 at 13:09 -0500, Michael Hennebry wrote:
On Wed, 18 Apr 2012, Michael Hennebry wrote:

The problems that I am aware of so far:

I seem to be stuck with KDE though I specified at least two other desktops.
The login screen did not have an obvious option for another desktop.

Do you know if you have KDM or GDM? If GDM, you get to pick a desktop
*after* you pick a username - there's a drop-down selector below the
password entry box.

gdm.
Thanks.

Which of these should I worry about?
[root@localhost ~]# grep -v stall install.log
warning: fontpackages-filesystem-1.44-2.fc15.noarch: Header V3 RSA/SHA256 Signature, key ID a82ba4b7: NOKEY
/var/tmp/rpm-tmp.70BdJf: line 1: /usr/sbin/update-alternatives: No such file or directory warning: %post(tomcat-servlet-3.0-api-0:7.0.26-1.fc16.noarch) scriptlet failed, exit status 127 /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.pKiL8w: line 1: /usr/sbin/update-alternatives: No such file or directory warning: %post(tomcat-jsp-2.2-api-0:7.0.26-1.fc16.noarch) scriptlet failed, exit status 127 /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.NaLh0X: line 3: find: command not found /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.hawg7Q: line 1: /usr/sbin/update-alternatives: No such file or directory warning: %post(tomcat-el-2.2-api-0:7.0.26-1.fc16.noarch) scriptlet failed, exit status 127

Not quite sure what's going on there; alternatives is a mechanism for
allowing multiple providers for a given file or set of files, basically.
update-alternatives is the tool to specify which one should be used, and
some packages use it in scripts, obviously. I'm not sure why it wouldn't
be present when they're trying to run it; badly stated  deps in the
packages or some kind of issue with usrmove maybe. I _doubt_ the
consequences would be critical, but it's hard to be sure.

IIRC alternatives works by manipulating symlinks.
The one time I tried to use it was for java.
Didn't like it very much, but don't remember details.

Running in chroot, ignoring request. SELinux: Could not downgrade policy file /etc/selinux/targeted/policy/policy.26, searching for an older version.
SELinux:  Could not open policy file <= /etc/selinux/targeted/policy/policy.26:  No such file or directory
load_policy:  Can't load policy:  No such file or directory

What does 'getenforce' say now?

Disabled

--
Michael   hennebry@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
"On Monday, I'm gonna have to tell my kindergarten class,
whom I teach not to run with scissors,
that my fiance ran me through with a broadsword."  --  Lily
--
test mailing list
test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test



[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Photo Sharing]     [Yosemite Forum]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux