On Fri, 2012-04-06 at 13:24 -0400, george2 wrote: > There is no release criterion in the Testing/QA group for the release > name. > Before millions see the latest great work from a multitude of > contributors, should this group pause to reflect if the release name > is appropriate for world wide release. I ask your attention that the > name/ logo/ and parody may offend many and may refuse to use it. Do > you have concerns after looking at > http://git.fedorahosted.org/git/?p=beefymiracle.git;a=shortlog;h=HEAD > and beefymiracle . org. The image of a hot dog in a bun (and in some > logo pictures, the use of the tag line mustard indicates progress) is > too laden with symbolism. Is there concern in this, the last group in > the process to concur with a release GO decision, that what has been > published in support of the release name will not offend women, > parents, and many who are spiritual or profess a religion? This is not QA's job at all. There is no quality to be assured. The release name gets decided under a process we aren't at all involved with. I don't see any reason why that should change. > No mater how liberal a guy I might be, this expresses a concern for > how open source might be perceived by the general public. > Even if these pictures and words were done in fun, isn't the > association now caustic. On an entirely personal note - the beefy miracle joke has been around in Fedora circles for years. There is absolutely no 'dirty' intent behind it. It's just a joke about a hot dog. If you read any more into it than that, that's entirely your own responsibility, and not anyone else's. -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | identi.ca: adamwfedora http://www.happyassassin.net -- test mailing list test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test