On Fri, 2012-04-06 at 15:37 -0400, Jon Stanley wrote: > On Fri, Apr 6, 2012 at 1:24 PM, george2 <george2@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > There is no release criterion in the Testing/QA group for the release name. > > Before millions see the latest great work from a multitude of contributors, > > should this group pause to reflect if the release name is appropriate for > > world wide release. I ask your attention that the name/ logo/ and parody > > may offend many and may refuse to use it. Do you have concerns after > > looking at > > http://git.fedorahosted.org/git/?p=beefymiracle.git;a=shortlog;h=HEAD and > > beefymiracle . org. The image of a hot dog in a bun (and in some logo > > pictures, the use of the tag line mustard indicates progress) is too laden > > with symbolism. Is there concern in this, the last group in the process to > > concur with a release GO decision, that what has been published in support > > of the release name will not offend women, parents, and many who are > > spiritual or profess a religion? > > This has *nothing* to do with QA. It however is a topic that the Board > has taken up. Further discussion on this topic should take place on > the advisory-board list. See > http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/advisory-board/2012-March/011418.html > for a starting place for the discussion that has already taken place. Is there a summary of the discussion for those of us without the will to read the whole frickin' thing? :) Speaking entirely personally, I'm firmly in the 'ditch the stupid release names, they serve no purpose' camp. -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | identi.ca: adamwfedora http://www.happyassassin.net -- test mailing list test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
