Re: QA as a sub-project: draft 'governance' section for the wiki

"Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" <johannbg@xxxxxxxxx> · Thu, 22 Mar 2012 01:02:25 +0000



    On 03/22/2012 12:29 AM, Robyn Bergeron wrote:
    
       So, the ultimate goal ... is to include 'quality assurance'
        under the list of sub-projects in the left-side navigation menu
        on the wiki. Is approval as a project required to achieve this?
        If so, I'd like to get the ball rolling to define QA as a
        sub-project. 
    
    
    Hmm I cant recall the bugzappers ever have gone through some formal
    SIG process I think they just were added there on the list 

    ( or strings where pulled to add them there to keep peace  ).

    
    It was not without a reason they decided to separate themselves from
    the QA community at that time. 

    
       Aside: The current state of projects and SIGs is slightly
        confusing on the wiki. Fr example, BugZappers?, a QA sub-project, is  listed as a SIG and  listed as a project in the left
        nav-menu. Also, QA is listed as sub-project on the  wiki start page, but not in the  list of projects. 
    
    
    As I mentioned as before things kinda ended up in that state. 

    
    Basically the board is faced with this. 

    
    A) make QA an SIG and merge bugzappers back into it

    
    Or 

    
    B) Split the relevant parts of QA into their own indvidual SIG (
    Triagers/Reporters/AutoQA etc ) with their own resources...

    
    We did not reach consensus back in the day but hey feel free to
    decide this for us...

    
    JBG

     
-- 
test mailing list
test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test