Because there was no suggestions, I've made changes. [1] is non-blockig now. And I have amended criterion in [2]. [1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Testcase_Anaconda_save_traceback_to_remote_system [2] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_17_Alpha_Release_Criteria On Tue, 2012-01-31 at 09:48 -0800, Adam Williamson wrote: > On Tue, 2012-01-31 at 07:15 -0500, Petr Schindler wrote: > > > > > Especially saving failures to disk is important for installation > > > > without net access. There are test cases [1], [2] and [3] for > > > > testing this feature. > > > > > > > > [1] > > > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Testcase_Anaconda_save_traceback_to_bugzilla > > > > [2] > > > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Testcase_Anaconda_save_traceback_to_disk > > > > [3] > > > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Testcase_Anaconda_save_traceback_to_remote_system > > > > > > Ah, that's part of my last-reply-but-one. :) I think certainly adding > > > local disk at Alpha is reasonable. I'm not so sure about supporting > > > saving to a remote system via ssh at Alpha. > > > > Ok, I would propose to change test case [1] to non-blocking. I think it could be enough to support saving reports only to disk and bugzilla. So I propose criterion: > > > > "The installer must be able to report failures to Bugzilla and local disk, with appropriate information included" > > > > [1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Testcase_Anaconda_save_traceback_to_remote_system > > That seems reasonable to me. Anyone else have any thoughts on this? > -- > Adam Williamson > Fedora QA Community Monkey > IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | identi.ca: adamwfedora > http://www.happyassassin.net > -- test mailing list test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
