Re: Proposal for enhancement of criterion

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, 2012-01-31 at 07:15 -0500, Petr Schindler wrote:

> > > Especially saving failures to disk is important for installation
> > > without net access. There are test cases [1], [2] and [3] for
> > > testing this feature.
> > > 
> > > [1]
> > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Testcase_Anaconda_save_traceback_to_bugzilla
> > > [2]
> > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Testcase_Anaconda_save_traceback_to_disk
> > > [3]
> > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Testcase_Anaconda_save_traceback_to_remote_system
> > 
> > Ah, that's part of my last-reply-but-one. :) I think certainly adding
> > local disk at Alpha is reasonable. I'm not so sure about supporting
> > saving to a remote system via ssh at Alpha.
> 
> Ok, I would propose to change test case [1] to non-blocking. I think it could be enough to support saving reports only to disk and bugzilla. So I propose criterion:
> 
> "The installer must be able to report failures to Bugzilla and local disk, with appropriate information included"
> 
> [1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Testcase_Anaconda_save_traceback_to_remote_system

That seems reasonable to me. Anyone else have any thoughts on this?
-- 
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | identi.ca: adamwfedora
http://www.happyassassin.net

-- 
test mailing list
test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test



[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Photo Sharing]     [Yosemite Forum]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux