> From: "Adam Williamson" <awilliam@xxxxxxxxxx> > To: "For testing and quality assurance of Fedora releases" <test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Sent: Tuesday, January 31, 2012 1:47:55 AM > Subject: Re: Proposal for enhancement of criterion > > On Mon, 2012-01-30 at 11:35 -0500, Petr Schindler wrote: > > I propose to enhance alpha criterion > > > > "The installer must be able to report failures to Bugzilla, with > > appropriate information included" > > to > > "The installer must be able to report failures to Bugzilla, remote > > system and local disk, with appopriate information included" > > > > Especially saving failures to disk is important for installation > > without net access. There are test cases [1], [2] and [3] for > > testing this feature. > > > > [1] > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Testcase_Anaconda_save_traceback_to_bugzilla > > [2] > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Testcase_Anaconda_save_traceback_to_disk > > [3] > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Testcase_Anaconda_save_traceback_to_remote_system > > Ah, that's part of my last-reply-but-one. :) I think certainly adding > local disk at Alpha is reasonable. I'm not so sure about supporting > saving to a remote system via ssh at Alpha. Ok, I would propose to change test case [1] to non-blocking. I think it could be enough to support saving reports only to disk and bugzilla. So I propose criterion: "The installer must be able to report failures to Bugzilla and local disk, with appropriate information included" [1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Testcase_Anaconda_save_traceback_to_remote_system -- test mailing list test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
