Adam Williamson (awilliam@xxxxxxxxxx) said: > On Tue, 2012-01-31 at 10:52 -0500, Bill Nottingham wrote: > > Petr Schindler (pschindl@xxxxxxxxxx) said: > > > > Yeah. As far as QA is concerned, the key questions are 'is there a > > > > minimal package set present, does an install with that package set > > > > complete properly, does it boot'. What's *in* it is not really our > > > > concern. > > > > > > So new beta criteria should be: > > > > > > "The installer must be able to complete package installation with a minimal usable set of packages" > > > > > > And what "minimal set" means should be defined somewhere else? And > > as soon as it will be somewhere, we should give the link. > > > > @core > > That's an implementation detail. It's not a capability-driven > description of which packages should actually be in the minimal package > set, as was discussed earlier in the thread. Merely stating that if you're linking to what the minimal set of packages will be, that's it. Bill -- test mailing list test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
