> From: "Adam Williamson" <awilliam@xxxxxxxxxx> > To: "For testing and quality assurance of Fedora releases" <test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Sent: Tuesday, January 31, 2012 4:51:56 AM > Subject: Re: New criterion for installation with minimal set of packages > > On Mon, 2012-01-30 at 21:56 -0500, Jon Stanley wrote: > > On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 8:49 PM, Adam Williamson > > <awilliam@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > Yeah, this is kind of problematic, because I don't really want > > > the > > > release criteria to prescribe exactly what the 'minimal' package > > > set > > > should include. Perhaps we should just explicitly refer to 'the > > > installer's "minimal" package set' or something like that > > > > True - come to think of it, I really don't believe that it is QA's > > domain to define the task list - but it should be somebody's. What > > I > > don't want is the feature creep of the "minimal" package set - next > > thing you know, GNOME will be part of that package set. But I don't > > think that QA is the appropriate place to address those concerns :) > > Yeah. As far as QA is concerned, the key questions are 'is there a > minimal package set present, does an install with that package set > complete properly, does it boot'. What's *in* it is not really our > concern. So new beta criteria should be: "The installer must be able to complete package installation with a minimal usable set of packages" And what "minimal set" means should be defined somewhere else? And as soon as it will be somewhere, we should give the link. -- test mailing list test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
