On Mon, 2012-01-30 at 21:56 -0500, Jon Stanley wrote: > On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 8:49 PM, Adam Williamson <awilliam@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > Yeah, this is kind of problematic, because I don't really want the > > release criteria to prescribe exactly what the 'minimal' package set > > should include. Perhaps we should just explicitly refer to 'the > > installer's "minimal" package set' or something like that > > True - come to think of it, I really don't believe that it is QA's > domain to define the task list - but it should be somebody's. What I > don't want is the feature creep of the "minimal" package set - next > thing you know, GNOME will be part of that package set. But I don't > think that QA is the appropriate place to address those concerns :) Yeah. As far as QA is concerned, the key questions are 'is there a minimal package set present, does an install with that package set complete properly, does it boot'. What's *in* it is not really our concern. -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | identi.ca: adamwfedora http://www.happyassassin.net -- test mailing list test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
