On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 8:49 PM, Adam Williamson <awilliam@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Yeah, this is kind of problematic, because I don't really want the > release criteria to prescribe exactly what the 'minimal' package set > should include. Perhaps we should just explicitly refer to 'the > installer's "minimal" package set' or something like that True - come to think of it, I really don't believe that it is QA's domain to define the task list - but it should be somebody's. What I don't want is the feature creep of the "minimal" package set - next thing you know, GNOME will be part of that package set. But I don't think that QA is the appropriate place to address those concerns :) -- test mailing list test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
