On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 1:57 PM, Kevin Fenzi <kevin@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Wed, 16 Nov 2011 10:53:17 -0800 > Adam Williamson <awilliam@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> On Wed, 2011-11-16 at 10:29 -0600, David Lehman wrote: >> > On Wed, 2011-11-16 at 09:42 -0600, Bruno Wolff III wrote: >> > > On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 21:42:40 -0600, >> > > Chris Adams <cmadams@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> > > > Old-grub also didn't support newer Linux-md metadata formats, >> > > > so that should be explicitly mentioned (I don't know about >> > > > grub2). >> > > >> > > grub1 supports md raid version 1.0 metadata. (That's the new one >> > > with the meta data at the end of the partition.) >> > >> > Right. grub1 supports 0.90 and 1.0. grub2 supports 0.90, 1.0, 1.1, >> > 1.2 AFAIK. >> >> So, summary: with grub2 we should actually be able to support /boot on >> RAID-0, RAID-1 or RAID-5, metadata 0.90, 1.0, 1.1 or 1.2? Is that >> accurate? > > When I upgraded my storage box and had to rebuild the /boot, I first > tried 1.2 metadata, but it did not seem to work. So, I went back to > 0.90 and it worked fine. We may want to confirm the support for 1.2 > before commiting to support it. Debian and Ubuntu default to metadata v1.2 and grub2 can boot fine. It's a weird, Fedora-specific problem. -- test mailing list test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
