On Wed, 16 Nov 2011 10:53:17 -0800 Adam Williamson <awilliam@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Wed, 2011-11-16 at 10:29 -0600, David Lehman wrote: > > On Wed, 2011-11-16 at 09:42 -0600, Bruno Wolff III wrote: > > > On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 21:42:40 -0600, > > > Chris Adams <cmadams@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > Old-grub also didn't support newer Linux-md metadata formats, > > > > so that should be explicitly mentioned (I don't know about > > > > grub2). > > > > > > grub1 supports md raid version 1.0 metadata. (That's the new one > > > with the meta data at the end of the partition.) > > > > Right. grub1 supports 0.90 and 1.0. grub2 supports 0.90, 1.0, 1.1, > > 1.2 AFAIK. > > So, summary: with grub2 we should actually be able to support /boot on > RAID-0, RAID-1 or RAID-5, metadata 0.90, 1.0, 1.1 or 1.2? Is that > accurate? When I upgraded my storage box and had to rebuild the /boot, I first tried 1.2 metadata, but it did not seem to work. So, I went back to 0.90 and it worked fine. We may want to confirm the support for 1.2 before commiting to support it. kevin
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
-- test mailing list test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
