On Thu, 2011-09-22 at 16:01 -0600, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: > On Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 15:48, Adam Jackson <ajax@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Thu, 2011-09-22 at 15:43 -0600, Jonathan Corbet wrote: > >> On Thu, 22 Sep 2011 23:05:28 +0200 > >> Michael Schwendt <mschwendt@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> > >> > IMO, it could be much more productive if you also > >> > evaluated Fedora 16 development instead of Fedora 17 development. > >> > >> Sigh. > >> > >> I've been running Rawhide for a very long time. As of the last year or > >> so, though, almost every post I make draws a response like this. > > > > I encourage you to ignore responses like this. Rawhide needs to be > > consumable. > > > > I would also like to see how we can FIX this better after Fedora 16 is > out the door. If it takes someone to be the rawhide wrangler who makes > sure that breakages get looked even when people are playing tiddly > winks with latest.. then we should look at it. Congratulations! *presents smooge with Rawhide wrangler hat* -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | identi.ca: adamwfedora http://www.happyassassin.net -- test mailing list test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
