On Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 15:48, Adam Jackson <ajax@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Thu, 2011-09-22 at 15:43 -0600, Jonathan Corbet wrote: >> On Thu, 22 Sep 2011 23:05:28 +0200 >> Michael Schwendt <mschwendt@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >> > IMO, it could be much more productive if you also >> > evaluated Fedora 16 development instead of Fedora 17 development. >> >> Sigh. >> >> I've been running Rawhide for a very long time. As of the last year or >> so, though, almost every post I make draws a response like this. > > I encourage you to ignore responses like this. Rawhide needs to be > consumable. > I would also like to see how we can FIX this better after Fedora 16 is out the door. If it takes someone to be the rawhide wrangler who makes sure that breakages get looked even when people are playing tiddly winks with latest.. then we should look at it. -- Stephen J Smoogen. "The core skill of innovators is error recovery, not failure avoidance." Randy Nelson, President of Pixar University. "Let us be kind, one to another, for most of us are fighting a hard battle." -- Ian MacLaren -- test mailing list test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
