On Thu, 2011-09-08 at 14:12 +0200, drago01 wrote: > On Wed, Sep 7, 2011 at 11:52 PM, Michael Schwendt <mschwendt@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Wed, 07 Sep 2011 14:42:07 -0700, AW (Adam) wrote: > > > Meanwhile, more updates have arrived, but could only be installed > > in two steps due to remaining broken deps: > > I don't really want to bring this up again but the fact that updates > with broken deps can end up on the mirros is a bug in bodhi and/or the > compose tools. PERIOD. I'd argue it's not really a 'bug' in the case of updates-testing. You can't stop people submitting updates with dependency issues. Would it be nice if AutoQA depcheck was 100% accurate and trusted enough by maintainers that we could have it block packages that fail from making it into updates-testing? Sure. But I'm not sure it's right to characterize that as a 'bug'. Kinda semantics, I know. -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | identi.ca: adamwfedora http://www.happyassassin.net -- test mailing list test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
