On Wed, 07 Sep 2011 14:42:07 -0700, AW (Adam) wrote: > > Ah, come on! That's close to blanket approval for such a high number of > > packages, which require much more individual testing. To sign them off > > all with a brief comment or a simple "works for me" isn't credible. > > On the contrary, I'd say it's exactly what we want. It doesn't benefit > anyone to hold up the entire default desktop in updates-testing because > Widget 234 in eog doesn't quite work right. I think it's right to allow > an entire-GNOME update through as long as it more or less works. If we > kept it in -testing until every niggling bug in every GNOME component > was fixed...we probably wouldn't have GNOME 3.2 until 2014. =) F16 is > still a *pre-release*, remember. We aren't expecting perfection at this > point. Don't forget the subject of this thread and similar ones. ;) Some of us are burnt with "Oh no!" crashes. Me even at gdm login time after applying yesterday's updates. That's not just "Widget 234" but something nasty. I could only log in after downgrading gnome-settings-daemon and found several GConf2 crashes in abrt-gui: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/736268 Meanwhile, more updates have arrived, but could only be installed in two steps due to remaining broken deps: yum --disablerepo=updates-testing downgrade empathy yum update [...] Updated: curl.x86_64 0:7.21.7-4.fc16 dracut.noarch 0:013-8.fc16 gdm.x86_64 1:3.1.90-1.fc16 gdm-plugin-fingerprint.x86_64 1:3.1.90-1.fc16 gnome-settings-daemon.x86_64 0:3.1.90-1.fc16 grilo-plugins.x86_64 0:0.1.16-2.fc16 grub2.x86_64 1:1.99-5.fc16 libcurl.x86_64 0:7.21.7-4.fc16 seahorse.x86_64 0:3.1.90-1.fc16 tracker.x86_64 0:0.11.2-1.fc16 verne-backgrounds-gnome.noarch 0:15.92.1-1.fc16 verne-backgrounds-single.noarch 0:15.92.1-1.fc16 -- Fedora release 16 (Verne) - Linux 3.1.0-0.rc4.git0.0.fc16.x86_64 loadavg: 0.22 0.45 0.30 -- test mailing list test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
