On Thu, 2011-08-25 at 16:49 -0600, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: > Well I was trying to suggest something that wasn't handy-wavy. At some > point a set of criteria are going to be needed for what is expected > out anaconda at the minimum. From that criteria a set of test > kickstarts can be built. If they dont' work then you have a blocker. > Is that better? Ah, I see - absolutely, when it comes to *test cases*, indeed the way to test it is going to be to have kickstarts in the test cases. I just tend to think first about defining the criteria, then writing the test cases. Sorry I didn't quite grok you! -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | identi.ca: adamwfedora http://www.happyassassin.net -- test mailing list test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
