On Wed, 2011-08-24 at 17:53 -0500, Michael Cronenworth wrote: > Rahul Sundaram wrote: > > Bodhi has the ability to bundle several updates together even when they > > are not direct dependencies. He is referring to that > > Yes, I understand Bodhi can link any group of packages together. > > > > > Example: > > > > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/kde-l10n-4.6.5-1.fc14,kdeaccessibility-4.6.5-1.fc14,kdeadmin-4.6.5-1.fc14,kdeartwork-4.6.5-1.fc14,kdebase-4.6.5-1.fc14,kdebase-runtime-4.6.5-1.fc14,kdebase-workspace-4.6.5-2.fc14,kdebindings-4.6.5-1.fc14,kdeedu-4.6.5-1.fc14,kdegames-4.6.5-1.fc14,kdegraphics-4.6.5-3.fc14,kdelibs-4.6.5-1.fc14,kdemultimedia-4.6.5-2.fc14,kdenetwork-4.6.5-1.fc14,kdepimlibs-4.6.5-1.fc14,kdeplasma-addons-4.6.5-1.fc14,kdesdk-4.6.5-1.fc14,kdetoys-4.6.5-1.fc14,kdeutils-4.6.5-2.fc14,oxygen-icon-theme-4.6.5-1.fc14 > > So there are items in this list that could be shipped in a separate > update without any negative side-effects? I'm not a KDE expert, but I > don't see a package that could be left off. > > If there are cases where package A and B are in an update and don't > relate to each other and would run without crashing in separate updates > then they should be in separate updates. I don't see that being the case > in this thread unless I'm drinking cool-aid, which I very well might be > doing. No, you're not. By all policy, the GNOME update should be one super-mega-giganto update, which it now is. We were just discussing the reasons maintainers aren't very fond of those updates. -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | identi.ca: adamwfedora http://www.happyassassin.net -- test mailing list test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
