On 08/16/2011 11:12 AM, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: > On Tue, Aug 16, 2011 at 08:06, Clyde E. Kunkel<clydekunkel7734@xxxxxxx> wrote: >> On 08/15/2011 11:07 PM, Adam Williamson wrote: >>> On Mon, 2011-08-15 at 21:38 -0400, Clyde E. Kunkel wrote: >>> >>>> >>>> Still not installable for me. Bzs 727966 and 723167 apply and both >>>> should be alpha blockers. >>> >>> 727966 requires custom layout, which makes it Final, not Alpha. 723167 >>> is supposed to be fixed in RC4; if you think it still applies, add a >>> comment with precise details. >>> <snip> >> >> Custom layout? What is so custom about /home being on a separae LV so >> you don't have to recreate it each time? Even not asking it to be >> mounted and just adding / and /boot results in 727966. > > It is custom because it isn't the default choices. The alpha test > criteria are default choices. Yes it means that some bugs will become > more expensive, but it also means that you can reach a point of saying > these items have been tested versus everything being a blocker. > > > > I'm not saying everything is a blocker--only the inability to install the DVD. Heck, you can't even boot a desktop spin that has been installed due to grub2 errors and since there is a good workaround for that it isn't a blocker. There is no workaround for the two bugs I listed even if you take the defaults of only /, swap and /boot. Please, all this said, I am fine with waiting for final for an installable DVD since (so far) the desktop spin is installable. I just have to express an opinion based on a lifetime of software development management. It is my contribution to the open software movement. -- Regards, OldFart -- test mailing list test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
