On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 01:26, Adam Williamson <awilliam@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Tue, 2011-08-09 at 15:39 -0400, Chuck Anderson wrote: > >> I don't see how it can be a "go" if Live doesn't work without >> enforcing=0: >> >> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=728863 >> >> I'm surprised RC3 was rushed so quickly with no resoution to this. I >> expect an RC4 will be necessary. > > We're working on that. The reason RC3 was spun was because we thought it > was solved with an selinux-policy update that was included in RC3. This > is all documented in the bug. True, it is documented in the bug - but not as you state here. The latest selinux-policy was in RC2 already and I had it tested within ~2h after the announcement. The result was clearly, that the issue at hand was not yet fixed (see comment #10). There have been no changes on this front before RC3 was released, so no chance of having it fixed. Just trying to correct the impression here, but I'm sure there's been reasons for RC3 on another front (libreport or so). Actually, I think RCs were spun too early and more TCs had been necessary - but that's mostly a naming thing so never mind. -- red -- test mailing list test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
