On 07/14/2011 11:16 AM, James Laska wrote: > On Wed, 2011-07-13 at 20:58 +0000, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote: >> On 07/13/2011 08:11 PM, James Laska wrote: >>> Quite a bit smaller than the 100+ bugs on the list. Was that decision >>> from a recent FESCO meeting? >> It's the one held on 15 June. >> >> See this thread on -devel [1] also note that FESCO accepted the feature >> [2] on the bases that native systemd unit files will be accepted up to >> beta after that no more native systemd service files will be introduced >> in the release during it's lifetime. >> >> "Developers will need to convert the old sysvinit init scripts to native >> systemd ones and/or review and use ones that have been provided to them >> and package them as per packaging guidelines which can be found here >> <http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines:Systemd> with sample >> scriptlet snippet which can be found here >> <http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:ScriptletSnippets#Systemd> no >> later then beta for inclusions in the release." >> >> 1.http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/2011-June/152780.html >> 2.http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/SysVtoSystemd > Thanks, that's all I could find too. I don't read that as meaning > anything sysvinit->systemd gets a free ride as an automatic blocker. I > read that as FESCO has approved the sysvinit->systemd feature to > continue developing beyond the feature freeze. I never said it was a blocker what I said was that it was aggreed to that service in +core + base + base -X plus what service are on the live cd would be alpha blockers see the meeting logs and the the thread on devel for that discussion. Once we are passed alpha I will do assessment on the conversion process and discuss with Fesco what ( if any ) next goal should be ( potential beta blockers ) . JBG -- test mailing list test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
