On 07/14/2011 11:28 AM, James Laska wrote: > Long story short, I agree it makes sense to keep this separate from the > blocker process. Agreed as well The sysv to systemd feature is a special case and should not be mixed into the standard QA workflow. The QA community should be aware of how important that it is that we convert and ship as many native systemd unit in one release cycle and potential issues we have to deal with if we dont and should perhaps help things move along anyway that said it's up to Fesco to evaluate on per sysv legacy init script bases when the time comes if they should be blockers or not since there might be substantial code writing/rework that needs to be done to properly integrate that service to systemd which for example might be the case with Audit. JBG -- test mailing list test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
