On Wed, 2011-07-13 at 20:58 +0000, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote: > On 07/13/2011 08:11 PM, James Laska wrote: > > Quite a bit smaller than the 100+ bugs on the list. Was that decision > > from a recent FESCO meeting? > > It's the one held on 15 June. > > See this thread on -devel [1] also note that FESCO accepted the feature > [2] on the bases that native systemd unit files will be accepted up to > beta after that no more native systemd service files will be introduced > in the release during it's lifetime. > > "Developers will need to convert the old sysvinit init scripts to native > systemd ones and/or review and use ones that have been provided to them > and package them as per packaging guidelines which can be found here > <http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines:Systemd> with sample > scriptlet snippet which can be found here > <http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:ScriptletSnippets#Systemd> no > later then beta for inclusions in the release." > > 1.http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/2011-June/152780.html > 2.http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/SysVtoSystemd Thanks, that's all I could find too. I don't read that as meaning anything sysvinit->systemd gets a free ride as an automatic blocker. I read that as FESCO has approved the sysvinit->systemd feature to continue developing beyond the feature freeze. Thanks, James
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- test mailing list test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
