2011/5/19 Rahul Sundaram <metherid@xxxxxxxxx>: > On 05/19/2011 07:42 PM, Michał Piotrowski wrote: >> >> Are you sure this is the only reason? Btrfs is still considered as >> "EXPERIMENTAL" by its developers. > > http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/2011-February/148863.html > > http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/2011-May/151344.html > >> Frankly, I do not too much care about what is "default" in Fedora, but >> it seems to me that "default" should mean stable for use, not >> experimental. > > I don't think Btrfs developers consider it experimental anymore "Btrfs filesystem (EXPERIMENTAL) Unstable disk format" http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=blob;f=fs/btrfs/Kconfig;h=ecb9fd3be1433838911f4c947627436d816cb136;hb=HEAD > since > they have documented that no further incompatible disk format changes > will be made and considering the fact that Red Hat has strong > participation in Btrfs development upstream, we rely on their expertise. . Sure > > Rahul > -- > test mailing list > test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > To unsubscribe: > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test -- Best regards, Michal http://eventhorizon.pl/ -- test mailing list test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
