i suspect that you are confusing raw policy with human readable policy
gen_tunable(allow_httpd_anon_write, false) versus bool httpd_anon_write false;
etc
Nope. I'll dig up some examples when I get home tonight. As for the
language syntax changes, this is what I meant:
On 22/06/2011 Daniel J Walsh wrote:
Now I have the rather unpleasant task of upgrading my own customised
policy from the FC13 to FC15 version. Are there any changes from FC13 to
FC15 in terms of the language syntax or anything else I need to be aware
of before I start?
Not that I recall. F16 will add new stuff.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
iEYEARECAAYFAk4CMZ0ACgkQrlYvE4MpobNMHwCggv7bZaDAYCwxoja+ek2e9+VC
HaIAoMM9V97gSfccgD9z1QPaqHZ6cZqB
=EYr7
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
So, in FC16 there was "new stuff" added in terms of changes to the
language syntax. As I am upgrading the policy from FC15 to the present
level (FC17) I just wanted to know what this "new stuff" is, that's all.
I've already figured out the if ... else statement additions, which I
don't remember seeing in 3.9 version of the policy, so provided I didn't
get this wrong I'd like to know what else has been added?
--
selinux mailing list
selinux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/selinux
