Miro Hrončok kirjoitti 28.3.2021 klo 23.23:
On Sun, Mar 28, 2021 at 2:48 PM Miro Hrončok <mhroncok(a)redhat.com> wrote:
Weird, I was under the impression that to fix the "unowned directory
problem" you had to "just" add "Requires: hicolor-icon-theme" to
the
package shipping the icons.
That is correct.
All my GUI application packages that ship
their own icons do that. Why would that dependency not be necessary?
I think we are misunderstanding each other here.
So the correct method is "Requires: hicolor-icon-theme". The reason I
initially understood this differently was this:
1. the guidelines give _filesystem_ and "other explicitly created
filesystem packages" the same standing in this phrase: "any directories
owned by the filesystem, man, or other explicitly created -filesystem
packages"
2. _filesystem_ is not given special treatment anywhere
3. you do not do "Requires: filesystem" to get /usr/bin created
Which sounds like a contrived argument, but really I really was just
trying to figure out how it should be done.
I already opened a pull request to clarify this, I have to redo it.
Otto
_______________________________________________
packaging mailing list -- packaging@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to packaging-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/packaging@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
