On Sun, Mar 28, 2021 at 2:48 PM Miro Hrončok <mhroncok@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On 28. 03. 21 14:11, Otto Urpelainen wrote:> Item 3 takes care of
> %{_datadir}/icons part, because that is included in
> > _filesystem_. The remainder hicolor/scalable/apps is unclear for me. Method 1
> > could be used. But there is also package _hicolor-icon-theme_. Is that package
> > an "explicitly created -filesystem package", so method 3 could be used? That
> > would feel natural, because hicolor is the fallback
> > theme that must exist according to freedesktop.org specification.
>
> Yes. hicolor-icon-theme acts like an "other explicitly created -filesystem
> package" here. It only contains the directories, cache and triggers.
>
> Maybe we should explicitly mention it in the guidelines, because it is a very
> common situation.
Weird, I was under the impression that to fix the "unowned directory
problem" you had to "just" add "Requires: hicolor-icon-theme" to the
package shipping the icons. All my GUI application packages that ship
their own icons do that. Why would that dependency not be necessary?
Fabio
_______________________________________________
packaging mailing list -- packaging@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to packaging-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/packaging@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
