I build a new upstream source for the package I maintain during January of each year, instead of
once every six months.
Currently I only submit other builds when a problem arises (with my package) during the production
engineering builds a the new release of Fedora. (Each build of my package automatically does
extensive testing).
In accordance with the new policy, should I submit a build with not real changes for each release of
Fedora ?
On 2/10/21 8:44 AM, Ben Cotton wrote:
In accordance with the new FESCo policy[1] the following
provenpackagers will be submitted for removal in two weeks based on a
lack of builds submitted in the last six months. If you received this
directly, you can reply off-list to indicate you believe you should
still have provenpackager status.
This is the first time we have done a regular audit of the
provenpackagers group, so please be patient with any hiccups in the
process. This will be done regularly at the branch point in each
release.
... snip ...
_______________________________________________
packaging mailing list -- packaging@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to packaging-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/packaging@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
