Re: libfoo.$major requirements/guidelines

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, 19 Aug 2019 19:09:19 -0000, Brian J. Murrell wrote:

> > Sounds more like the Debian way of packaging shared objects, but it
> > doesn't solve the resulting conflict on libfoo.so in devel packages.  
> 
> There's no conflict in -devel packages.  libfoo.so is a symlink to the real libfoo.so.$major and only one -devel is allowed to be installed at a time and it usually matches the latest libfoo$major package.
> 

That is an implict conflict between the packages nevertheless, since it
results in a conflict, if one package is installed already and you need to
install the other package. Of course, you can avoid the conflict manually
by removing either package from the installation, but having to do that is
annoying.
_______________________________________________
packaging mailing list -- packaging@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to packaging-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/packaging@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite Forum]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux