On Sat, Mar 30, 2019 at 3:40 PM Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Le samedi 30 mars 2019 à 09:59 +0000, Tom Hughes a écrit : > > On 30/03/2019 08:27, Nicolas Mailhot wrote: > > > > > Thanks for the suggestion. That may work indeed, depending on rpm > > > operator priority. To be sure, you'd need lots of lispy parenthesis > > > (as > > > the rpm documentation seems to recommend). > > > > > > ((((x >= 1.3.0) without x = 1.3.2) without (x = 1.3.4)) without (x > > > = 1.5.7) Come to think of it, I'd normally use: BuildRequires: x >= 1.3.0 Conflicts: x = 1.3.2 Conflicts: x = 1.3.4 Life can get.... interesting, if "x" is a "Provides:" element rather than the actual name of the package, such as those for java, python modules, or perl modules. _______________________________________________ packaging mailing list -- packaging@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to packaging-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/packaging@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
