Le vendredi 29 mars 2019 à 22:25 +0000, Tom Hughes a écrit : > > I think something like this would work: > > BuildRequires: (x >= 1.3.0 without x = 1.3.2 without x = 1.3.4) > > That requires a single package that meets the first condition > but not either of the other two conditions if I'm reading the > documentation correctly. Thanks for the suggestion. That may work indeed, depending on rpm operator priority. To be sure, you'd need lots of lispy parenthesis (as the rpm documentation seems to recommend). ((((x >= 1.3.0) without x = 1.3.2) without (x = 1.3.4)) without (x = 1.5.7) Unfortunately both solutions (no parenthesis, cross fingers, lots of parenthesis, sure result) are quite human unfriendly. So I'm going to try ((x >= 1.3.0) without ((x = 1.3.2) or (x = 1.3.4) or (x = 1.5.7))) which is sure to work semantically, and is more regular and human- friendly Of course sure to work semantically does not means sure to work as implemented in the solver. Will need testing I anyone has better ideas… Regards, -- Nicolas Mailhot _______________________________________________ packaging mailing list -- packaging@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to packaging-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/packaging@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
