Dne 10. 03. 19 v 23:17 Neal Gompa napsal(a):
> On Sun, Mar 10, 2019 at 6:13 PM Miro Hrončok <mhroncok@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> Hi, I've just realized that %dist is defined to:
>>
>> %{?distprefix}.fc30%{?with_bootstrap:~bootstrap}
>>
>> That effectively means that using %bcond_without bootstrap, the dist is changed
>> to .fc31~bootstrap.
This is the latest discussion about `%bcond_without bootstrap` as far as
I remember (of course except the ticket bellow).
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/packaging@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/thread/LO4PPOQNM5DONMG4MKRZ4EQQXSBFVJTN/#QCRIFXIHLFUADVD445UYDQQPDBIKC6IA
>>
>> Is this something that we actually want? E.g. I was quite surprised by the behavior.
>>
>> Reading https://pagure.io/packaging-committee/issue/818
>> gives me an impression that the packaging committee didn't really approve nor
>> forbid this, so I'm looking for recommendation.
>>
>> When I bootstrap, should I manually bump the release number or let this magic
>> happen?
> Let the magic happen. Embrace it, and it will help you. 😁
+1
V.
>
>> Also, how do I opt-out from this behavior (other than renaming my conditional)?
>>
> I don't think you can unless you rename your conditional. This part
> was kinda added for Go things by Nicolas Mailhot. 🤷♂️
>
>
>
_______________________________________________
packaging mailing list -- packaging@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to packaging-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/packaging@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
