On Sun, Mar 10, 2019 at 6:13 PM Miro Hrončok <mhroncok@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Hi, I've just realized that %dist is defined to:
>
> %{?distprefix}.fc30%{?with_bootstrap:~bootstrap}
>
> That effectively means that using %bcond_without bootstrap, the dist is changed
> to .fc31~bootstrap.
>
> Is this something that we actually want? E.g. I was quite surprised by the behavior.
>
> Reading https://pagure.io/packaging-committee/issue/818
> gives me an impression that the packaging committee didn't really approve nor
> forbid this, so I'm looking for recommendation.
>
> When I bootstrap, should I manually bump the release number or let this magic
> happen?
Let the magic happen. Embrace it, and it will help you. 😁
>
> Also, how do I opt-out from this behavior (other than renaming my conditional)?
>
I don't think you can unless you rename your conditional. This part
was kinda added for Go things by Nicolas Mailhot. 🤷♂️
--
真実はいつも一つ！/ Always, there's only one truth!
_______________________________________________
packaging mailing list -- packaging@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to packaging-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/packaging@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
