Hi, I've just realized that %dist is defined to:
%{?distprefix}.fc30%{?with_bootstrap:~bootstrap}
That effectively means that using %bcond_without bootstrap, the dist is changed
to .fc31~bootstrap.
Is this something that we actually want? E.g. I was quite surprised by the behavior.
Reading https://pagure.io/packaging-committee/issue/818
gives me an impression that the packaging committee didn't really approve nor
forbid this, so I'm looking for recommendation.
When I bootstrap, should I manually bump the release number or let this magic
happen?
Also, how do I opt-out from this behavior (other than renaming my conditional)?
--
Miro Hrončok
--
Phone: +420777974800
IRC: mhroncok
_______________________________________________
packaging mailing list -- packaging@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to packaging-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/packaging@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
