Re: Package Guidelines: Should config files follow upstream or Fedora defaults?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Am Do., 11. Okt. 2018 um 09:57 Uhr schrieb Dominik 'Rathann'
Mierzejewski <dominik@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
> On Thursday, 11 October 2018 at 09:42, Christopher Engelhard wrote:
> > This implies that the spec contains multiple /etc/sshguard.conf files. I
> > can ship them as %doc sshguard.conf.<backend>, and then cp them to
> > sshguard.conf during %post <subpackage>, but then no package would own
> > that file, right?
>
> You can use %ghost to own a file that is created in %post or at runtime.
> Also, there's no problem if two conflicting packages own the same file.

But be aware that packages might be installed omitting docs, and thus
that copying step would fail.

Regards,
Thomas
_______________________________________________
packaging mailing list -- packaging@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to packaging-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/packaging@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite Forum]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux